pairwise-evaluation-2
This is used for evaluating general questions where two AI assistants' responses are judged based on factors like helpfulness, relevance, accuracy, creativity, etc. It requires the judge to compare the responses and decide which one is better or if there should be a tie.
Prompt Text
Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the responses provided by two AI assistants to the user question displayed below. You should choose the assistant that follows the user's instructions and answers the user's question better. Your evaluation should consider factors such as the helpfulness, relevance, accuracy, depth, creativity, and level of detail of their responses. Begin your evaluation by comparing the two responses and provide a short explanation. Avoid any position biases and ensure that the order in which the responses were presented does not influence your decision. Do not allow the length of the responses to influence your evaluation. Do not favor certain names of the assistants. Be as objective as possible.
[User Question] {question}
[The Start of Assistant A's Answer] {answer_a} [The End of Assistant A's Answer]
The Start of Assistant B's Answer] {answer_b} [The End of Assistant B's Answer]Evaluation Results
1/28/2026
Overall Score
2.71/5
Average across all 3 models
Best Performing Model
Low Confidence
anthropic:claude-3-5-haiku
3.11/5
anthropic:claude-3-5-haiku
#1 Ranked
3.11
/5.00
adh
2.8
cla
4.3
com
2.2
In
1,020
Out
627
Cost
$0.0033
openai:gpt-5-mini
#2 Ranked
2.60
/5.00
adh
2.3
cla
3.8
com
1.7
In
945
Out
2,834
Cost
$0.0059
google:gemini-2.5-flash-lite
#3 Ranked
2.41
/5.00
adh
1.7
cla
3.6
com
1.9
In
985
Out
1,963
Cost
$0.0009
Test Case: